<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TREND 3: Pervasive Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nextleap.wordpress.com/trend-3-pervasive-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nextleap.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>COMPETITIVE IRELAND IN THE DIGITAL ERA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J Doyle</title>
		<link>http://nextleap.wordpress.com/trend-3-pervasive-internet/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>J Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextleap.wordpress.com/?page_id=45#comment-47</guid>
		<description>The first section is indisputable, and we must certainly do more to harness mobile connectivity.  On access and spectrum, we must balance experimentation with the need for robust availability.  

I agree that advertising will help to facilitate services, but also with the comment above on scale: telecoms is a nearly 2 trillion US$ business, and marketing-and-advertising are at least one third of that.  So the numbers for mobile advertising are rather modest, but may still be crucial in helping people to try services for the first time, or making them more affordable.  One small caution: most of what is now labelled &quot;mobile advertising&quot; is in fact below-the-line activitiy, larketing promos and similar.  Most mainline, big-agency, advertising, has no notion of going mobile to any great degree yet.  But internet, yes: online ads are proving more resilient than most offline forms, especially print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first section is indisputable, and we must certainly do more to harness mobile connectivity.  On access and spectrum, we must balance experimentation with the need for robust availability.  </p>
<p>I agree that advertising will help to facilitate services, but also with the comment above on scale: telecoms is a nearly 2 trillion US$ business, and marketing-and-advertising are at least one third of that.  So the numbers for mobile advertising are rather modest, but may still be crucial in helping people to try services for the first time, or making them more affordable.  One small caution: most of what is now labelled &#8220;mobile advertising&#8221; is in fact below-the-line activitiy, larketing promos and similar.  Most mainline, big-agency, advertising, has no notion of going mobile to any great degree yet.  But internet, yes: online ads are proving more resilient than most offline forms, especially print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Almatev</title>
		<link>http://nextleap.wordpress.com/trend-3-pervasive-internet/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>R Almatev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextleap.wordpress.com/?page_id=45#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Brief and pointy, good. However, this sort of section could use some more facts - what percentage of Irish people *do* have laptops? palmtops? smartphones? And pace earlier comments, how many actually use them for Web 2.0, commerce or secure transactions?

The point on spectrum is good, and we should avoid the sad messes in several other countries, but we should also watch out for probable dead ends, such as the much-touted but badly-lagging WiMax - the approach of Nokia, leader in devices, and Ericsson, top network seller, is instructive.

With 4 billion mobile or cellular subscribers, the small device is indeed probably the real key. A good point on advertising, as costs are definitely a barrier. But again, reality check - 1.3 bn out of a 650 bn USD industry?? Even 7.6 bn out of by then maybe 850 bn?? But maybe it will do better, at least in countries like Ireland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brief and pointy, good. However, this sort of section could use some more facts &#8211; what percentage of Irish people *do* have laptops? palmtops? smartphones? And pace earlier comments, how many actually use them for Web 2.0, commerce or secure transactions?</p>
<p>The point on spectrum is good, and we should avoid the sad messes in several other countries, but we should also watch out for probable dead ends, such as the much-touted but badly-lagging WiMax &#8211; the approach of Nokia, leader in devices, and Ericsson, top network seller, is instructive.</p>
<p>With 4 billion mobile or cellular subscribers, the small device is indeed probably the real key. A good point on advertising, as costs are definitely a barrier. But again, reality check &#8211; 1.3 bn out of a 650 bn USD industry?? Even 7.6 bn out of by then maybe 850 bn?? But maybe it will do better, at least in countries like Ireland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
