<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Options for Government action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nextleap.wordpress.com/trend-4-a-global-digital-media-boom/options-for-government-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nextleap.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>COMPETITIVE IRELAND IN THE DIGITAL ERA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J Doyle</title>
		<link>http://nextleap.wordpress.com/trend-4-a-global-digital-media-boom/options-for-government-action/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>J Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextleap.wordpress.com/?page_id=54#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to see a discussion on the first proposal but do not see it as a useful, or even as yet necessary step.  It would, mind you, be good to cut the clutter of State-supported bodies, but the ones mentioned are rather radically different from each other.  The second proposal, for a sort of steering group, sounds more practical, and could replace the first, if such a group were outside any government entity.  I think we probably could use some small and fast-moving group to better drive and &quot;sell&quot; our media capabilities.  As said elsewhere, we have certainly, from remote past through 19th and 20th centuries, to today, done well in media and arts, and every asset we have can be treated in so many more ways today.  Every film, TV series, book can spawn so much else.

On the idea for RTE, it sounds interesting but would involve a huge transformation of an old and rather settled organisation.  Granted, RTE has become more flexible, and has learnt to work with the indepdendent sector more (albeit many are former colleagues), still, I am unsure.  RTE was never very like C4.  Then again, why not try, but with one unit, and limited funding and a firm timescale.

While a good busines idea will be pursued with or without incentives - if it is really valuable, it must be profitable without same - but I do like the idea of &quot;modernising&quot; the tax concession for creative artists, with a suitable cap, etc., and it might just make the difference for some people to take a chance on going into something new but initially marginal.  Well spotted by someone on the opening in EU law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see a discussion on the first proposal but do not see it as a useful, or even as yet necessary step.  It would, mind you, be good to cut the clutter of State-supported bodies, but the ones mentioned are rather radically different from each other.  The second proposal, for a sort of steering group, sounds more practical, and could replace the first, if such a group were outside any government entity.  I think we probably could use some small and fast-moving group to better drive and &#8220;sell&#8221; our media capabilities.  As said elsewhere, we have certainly, from remote past through 19th and 20th centuries, to today, done well in media and arts, and every asset we have can be treated in so many more ways today.  Every film, TV series, book can spawn so much else.</p>
<p>On the idea for RTE, it sounds interesting but would involve a huge transformation of an old and rather settled organisation.  Granted, RTE has become more flexible, and has learnt to work with the indepdendent sector more (albeit many are former colleagues), still, I am unsure.  RTE was never very like C4.  Then again, why not try, but with one unit, and limited funding and a firm timescale.</p>
<p>While a good busines idea will be pursued with or without incentives &#8211; if it is really valuable, it must be profitable without same &#8211; but I do like the idea of &#8220;modernising&#8221; the tax concession for creative artists, with a suitable cap, etc., and it might just make the difference for some people to take a chance on going into something new but initially marginal.  Well spotted by someone on the opening in EU law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Almatev</title>
		<link>http://nextleap.wordpress.com/trend-4-a-global-digital-media-boom/options-for-government-action/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>R Almatev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextleap.wordpress.com/?page_id=54#comment-34</guid>
		<description>OK, I get the problem. But I&#039;m afraid I just do not believe these bodies *can* combine, and if they did try, I fear a new super-quango with the worst traits of all the others. But I do understand the problem, every business player who wants to innovate has hit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I get the problem. But I&#8217;m afraid I just do not believe these bodies *can* combine, and if they did try, I fear a new super-quango with the worst traits of all the others. But I do understand the problem, every business player who wants to innovate has hit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyryan</title>
		<link>http://nextleap.wordpress.com/trend-4-a-global-digital-media-boom/options-for-government-action/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnyryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextleap.wordpress.com/?page_id=54#comment-32</guid>
		<description>This point was prompted by input from a number of respondents that they were unable to approach certain bodies for assistance because of their narrow constraints on format and content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This point was prompted by input from a number of respondents that they were unable to approach certain bodies for assistance because of their narrow constraints on format and content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R Almatev</title>
		<link>http://nextleap.wordpress.com/trend-4-a-global-digital-media-boom/options-for-government-action/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>R Almatev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextleap.wordpress.com/?page_id=54#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Here we part company somewhat. I cannot really comment on RTE, but have doubts. But the idea of a super-unified Creative Arts body I do not believe in at all. The various groups in that sector already do not work together well. A new quango will not change this. Maybe when the world has changed further, in ten years. But surely better inter-working can do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we part company somewhat. I cannot really comment on RTE, but have doubts. But the idea of a super-unified Creative Arts body I do not believe in at all. The various groups in that sector already do not work together well. A new quango will not change this. Maybe when the world has changed further, in ten years. But surely better inter-working can do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyryan</title>
		<link>http://nextleap.wordpress.com/trend-4-a-global-digital-media-boom/options-for-government-action/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnyryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nextleap.wordpress.com/?page_id=54#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Neil Leyden wrote a piece on the idea of a digital IFSC for Enterprise Ireland whiich is worth reading - http://www.enterprise-ireland.com/NR/rdonlyres/D542C34C-2817-41F4-A915-70D8A70647E9/0/Howtocleanuponcontent.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil Leyden wrote a piece on the idea of a digital IFSC for Enterprise Ireland whiich is worth reading &#8211; <a href="http://www.enterprise-ireland.com/NR/rdonlyres/D542C34C-2817-41F4-A915-70D8A70647E9/0/Howtocleanuponcontent.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.enterprise-ireland.com/NR/rdonlyres/D542C34C-2817-41F4-A915-70D8A70647E9/0/Howtocleanuponcontent.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
